Giulio Perego vs Matteo Mesaglio Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Sep at 12:49 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Perego vs M. Mesaglio

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Perego 1 - 0 Mesaglio
They have played 2 sets in total, with Giulio Perego winning 2 and Matteo Mesaglio winning 0. The last match between Giulio Perego and Matteo Mesaglio was at the M15 Bologna, 01-09-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Giulio Perego getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Perego | 1 |
| Mesaglio | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M15 Bologna(09-01-25)
G. Perego vs M. Mesaglio H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 60.92% (53-34) | Career Total W/L | 48.94% (23-24) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Perego vs M. Mesaglio Match Preview:
- Both Mesaglio and Perego have similar performance on second serves recently, with Perego edging slightly ahead by winning 42.24% of points compared to Mesaglio’s 42.11%.
- In terms of returning second serves, Perego has shown better recent form, winning 45.79% compared to Mesaglio’s 43.93%.
- However, when returning first serves, Mesaglio has a slight advantage, winning 34.32% over Perego’s 31.64%.
- Who handles pressure better? Mesaglio saves 47.73% of break points, but Perego is more effective, saving 51.39%.
- In overall match performance over the last year, Mesaglio has a higher win percentage at 55.88%, while Perego is at 52.63%.
- Mesaglio's best surface is Hard, with a 54% win rate, whereas Perego excels on Clay with a 60% win rate.
- While Mesaglio competes against higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 151.62, Perego's opponents average a rank of 218.58.
- Mesaglio shows a stronger performance in deciding sets, winning 50% over the last year, compared to Perego's 38% success rate.
- Perego demonstrates better breakpoint conversion, capitalizing on 40.91% of opportunities versus Mesaglio’s 33.9%.
- Both players have mostly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, with performance levels being closely matched over the past year.
Editorial Prediction (September 1, 2025, UTC):
In this upcoming match, both players exhibit strengths and weaknesses that may heavily influence the outcome. Perego has shown slightly better performance on return games, especially against second serves, which could give him an edge in key points during the match.
However, Mesaglio has faced more challenging opponents on average in the past year, which may prepare them better for high-pressure moments. Additionally, Mesaglio’s superior performance in deciding sets suggests resilience in tightly contested matches.
Considering Mesaglio's ability to perform under pressure and his competitive experience against top-ranked players, he appears to have a slight upper hand. Nevertheless, Perego's more efficient breakpoint conversion and return stats indicate it will be a close contest.
Given all these factors, fans can expect a competitive match, but Mesaglio is likely the favorite to emerge victorious.
Giulio Perego vs Matteo Mesaglio Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Perego vs M. Mesaglio H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:32:12 | Average Match Time | 1:32:12 |
| 72% (43/60) | 1st Serve % | 60% (36/60) |
| 67% (29/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (22/36) |
| 65% (11/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 47% (28/60) | Return Points Win % | 33% (20/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Perego Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 7-5 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 4-6 10-6 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||
M. Mesaglio Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 3-6 10-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 6-1 | ||

G. Perego vs M. Mesaglio Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.92% (53/34) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.94% (23/24) |
| 59.90% (121/81) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.57% (51/54) |
| 53.64% (1061/917) | Games Win/Loss | 49.90% (481/483) |
| 60.00% (15/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.25% (9/7) |
| 61.29% (38/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.16% (14/17) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 165 | Aces Total | 10 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 118 | Total Double Faults | 64 |
| 1:9:37 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 265.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 159.91 |
| 64% (2329/3642) | 1st Serve % | 55% (625/1134) |
| 66% (1526/2329) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (374/625) |
| 51% (664/1313) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (224/509) |
| 44% (163/371) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (48/99) |
| 41% (1475/3638) | Return Points Win % | 41% (419/1031) |
| 60.92% (53/34) | Futures W/L | 48.94% (23/24) |
| 60% (52/86) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (22/46) |
| 59% (13/22) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 45% (13/29) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (6/12) |
| 85% (55/47) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (26/21) |
| 13% (55/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (26/5) |
| 16% (32/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (21/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Leolia Jeanjean vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
